🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an celebration that was initiated as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has adopted a commercial tone, expanding to include events where Black people are paid to address Caucasian groups about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The surge has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in October in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the Netherlands.

The month has developed since that time, focusing less on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and more on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the observance is commemorated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it evolves is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the current time in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the summer we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels empowered to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a source of worry. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the European continent as a whole.

In the America, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A drive to scrub the history of people of color and narrative from the historical documents is under way. One of the former president's first executive orders focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the month illustrates how little it can be influential if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the conditions of the present. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is required. An academic expert, a prof at a learning establishment, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just eliminate things like Black History Month completely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an time that has been ineffective.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as certain organizations are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not shy away from governmental matters, and allows opportunity for people, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves simple recognition of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the street? Institutions who observe it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to subtle slights, but challenged by the risks that face all if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is required – Black History is Now Month.