🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to restrict social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising number of countries are moving toward parallel measures.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that smartphones and apps are "robbing our kids' innocence". Legislation could be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban is "a potential options in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has called on the legislature to enact a proposal increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a similar move, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has recommended guardians to restrict their children from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for minors unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not create binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a good first step," commented one MEP driving the resolution.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "nothing is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "based on robust research".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the topic.

Charities have expressed concerns. An organization set up by the loved ones of a teenager who was lost after viewing disturbing platform posts suggests that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are safe and age appropriate for young users," said a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, legislation is mostly happening at the local level due to federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a law prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has approved a regulation restricting minors to one hour of social media use per day, with any further time needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise passed bills mandating parental consent for minors to set up social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from some individuals to mimic the Australian example, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Beyond the West, other nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, global agencies adopt a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even backfire". The agency notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to prioritize safety.

As this international conversation evolves, the steps of Australia and its followers show that states internationally are no longer prepared to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.